Tag Archives: katniss

A Capitol Error

The marketing for the Catching Fire movie, sequel to The Hunger Games, has been mostly great so far.  (Well, despite that Finnick mis-step).  This week, they’ve been releasing individual cast member photos in Capitol Couture style.  The first was Effie Trinket and premiered on the Capitol Couture tumblr, which is designed to front as if it is a fashion blog existing in the universe of the Hunger Games series.  (Even its url, .pn, is a nod to it’s location in the fictional country of Panem.)

Effie Trinket's Capitol Couture portrait.

Effie Trinket’s Capitol Couture portrait.

These portraits started off really strong.  They featured characters like Ceasar Flickerman, Cinna, and our first official glimpses at Johanna Mason and Beetee.

We got a new picture of Katniss, which I thought was fantastic, styled in an extravagant white gown that I assumed was one of the 5 wedding gowns she’s made to model for the Capitol audience’s voting pleasure so they can select which one she should get married in.  I mean she would obviously never style herself this way.

Katniss Everdeen's Capitol Couture portrait for Catching Fire.

Katniss Everdeen’s Capitol Couture portrait for Catching Fire.

Peeta matches Katniss in an all-white outfit, and is seated in a chair the same style as the one she’s standing beside so that they can be easily photoshoped together.  His boots even look to me like they could be hiding a prosthetic leg, if you want to pretend the first movie didn’t drastically alter the extent of his Arena injuries.  Maybe Katniss is standing because she’s the one who takes the most active stance against the Capitol, but maybe Peeta’s sitting because he’s the one who got stabbed in the leg?

Peeta Mellark's Capitol Couture portrait for Catching Fire.

Peeta Mellark’s Capitol Couture portrait for Catching Fire.

But then, everything in this wonderful, creative campaign was tainted when they threw in a picture of Gale.

Gale Whatshislastname's inexplicable Capitol Couture portrait.

Gale Hawthorne’s inexplicable Capitol Couture portrait.

Gale’s inclusion in this series makes no sense on a number of levels.  Firstly and most obviously because Gale never goes to the Capitol.   How would he have the opportunity to be styled and sit for this picture, and why would the Capitol be interested in profiling him anyway?  Gale is known to the Panem television audience only as “Katniss’ cousin,” hardly on the same level as Game fixtures like the mentors, stylists, tributes, or announcer like all the other featured characters in this series are.  Gale would definitely not be featured before Prim, at least.  (Maybe there’s a Prim picture yet to surface?)  I mean, yes, I know that in reality the actor Liam Hemsworth would pose for whatever promotional pictures his contract stipulated, and that the movie’s marketers want to emphasize him because he is an important figure in Katniss’ life (and because they’re trying to encourage a Team Peeta vs. Team Gale Twilight-esque atmosphere), but they’re the one who set this whole portrait series up as if it were coming from the shallow drama-obsessed Gamemakers of the Capitol!

Now they’re just completely undermining themselves, because this inclusion of Gale–holding a single white rose, which appeared to mark Tributes at the 75th Annual Hunger Games, until his out-of-place picture showed up, and no it doesn’t make sense to say “well then the white rose symbolizes those who rebel against President Snow”, because if that were true then Haymitch and Cinna should each have one as well–only forces me to be reminded that this whole thing is for a movie and despite the promise of creativity is actually being handled the same annoying way Hollywood handles everything.  Reduce complex characters and interpersonal relationships to BOY LOVES GIRL, MAYBE!  Assume that the audience is too stupid to pick up on nuance or notice blatant inconsistencies.  Never let a main character wear protective headgear for an entire battle sequence, etc.

I mean would it have killed them to feature Gale some other way, in some other campaign, or in a solo image styled and released separately?  I’m not the only one that noticed this discrepancy, by the way; many of the comments on Gale’s portrait at fansite Mockingjay.net point out the same thing.  What do you think?

I don’t think I would be so frustrated if they hadn’t been on such a spectacular streak with the let’s-pretend-the-Capitol-is-a-real-place campaign, until this point.  Maybe they’ll have it mastered in time for the next film, though.

2 Comments

Filed under movies

Stop Trying to Make “Katnnick” Happen. It’s Not Going to Happen.

Entertainment Weekly has revealed their exclusive first official look at images for Catching Fire, sequel to The Hunger Games.  Let’s analyze:

This new cover features Sam Claflin as new cast memeber Finnick and Jennifer Lawrence returning as Katniss.  Finnick is a previously victorious Tribute from District 4.  Spoiler alert–but really how are they going to market this film without letting people figure this out–the 75th Annual Hunger Games Tributes are reaped from the pool of existing victors.  So Finnick, along with Katniss (and Peeta, whose photographic absence I’ll get to in a bit) must return to an Arena and fight against 23 Tributes to the live-televised death.

This time the Arena is–spoiler alert–mostly water, with the cornucopia on an island in the center and a strip of land around the outside of a circular sea.  That’s why their outfits this time are basically wetsuits, although that’s not quite how they were dressed in the book:

This year’s tribute outfit is a fitted blue jumpsuit, made of very sheer material, that zippers up the front.  A six-inch-wise padded belt covered in shiny purple plastic.  A pair of nylon shoes with rubber soles.

The purple belts (which double as flotation devices) probably wouldn’t look particularly sexy, but in the book, the thin jumpsuits are easily ruined and they end up running around in their underwear most of the time.  So the change to wetsuits for the movie is maybe an even trade-off, but I don’t think they’re very flattering.  And it looks like they’ve included built-in flotation devices, like the bulge visible on Katniss’ elbow in the picture above, instead of the belt.   But speaking of book vs. movie aesthetics, you know the movie is going to either leave out the part where they are covered in scabs which are covered by goopy medicine, making them look like they’re “decomposing”, according to Finnick, or they’ll minimize the scabs so they don’t cover their faces, or they’ll strategically place just one wound above Finnick’s left eyebrow or along his chiseled cheekline.  You know they’ll keep him looking hot the whole film, and if they include this line from the book, it will be humorous for more than one reason:

“Poor Finnick.  Is this the first time in your life you haven’t looked pretty?” I say.

“It must be.  The sensations’s completely new.  How have you managed it all these years?” he asks.

Personally I think Finnick looks great on this cover, although from what I’ve seen in the blogosphere so far that doesn’t appear to be a unanimous opinion.  My only complaint about him is that the wetsuit makes his abs and hips look bulgy when I’m pretty positive they are not.  (Attention, Catching Fire marketing executives: you’d better release a shirtless Finnick picture so I can be sure.  For research purposes.)  I’m more inclined to nitpick this presentation of Katniss: why is her hair so shiny and her bangs so straight and perfect, like a Barbie doll?  (It does appear to be the same style braid that she wore in the first film.)  Her face looks more angular than usual–how much did they photoshop it?  Look at the line between her chin and her neck.  And now you can’t stop staring at her huge neck, right?  Necks are weird.

The second exclusive picture from EW is also of Finnick and Katniss, but this time it looks like they’re in Tribute training.  I thought at first that this was the infamous sugar cube scene, but they would be dressed (or mostly undressed, in his case) in their parade outfits if it were.  Still, this picture has that same vibe, with him flirting to tease her and Katniss trying to ignore him and not blush.

quote about sugar cube

“Hello, Katniss,” he says, as if we’ve known each other for years, when in fact we’ve never met.

I mean, this picture looks great for that, but what worries me is the total absence of Peeta in either of these first official pictures.  Peeta was what I was most worried about for the adaptation of the first book, and he was only okay in the film, which is a problem because–spoiler alert–Peeta Mellark is THE BEST.  Even Katniss thinks so:

In this way, Peeta’s not hard to predict.  While I was wallowing around on the floor of that cellar, thinking only of myself, he was here, thinking only of me.  Shame isn’t a strong enough word for what I feel.

“You could live a hundred lifetimes and not deserve him, you know,” Haymitch says.

“Yeah, yeah,” I say brusquely.  “No question, he’s the superior one in this trio.  So, what are you going to do?”

The movies are already off to a bad start doing Peeta’s character justice, and with this marketing it’s like they’re not even giving him a chance.  And how many people are going to look at this and think that Sam Claflin is Peeta?  If they didn’t read the books, if they only saw the movie once, or if they’re only familiar with The Hunger Games through pop culture osmosis?

I hate that these two images are presenting Finnick and Katniss as a couple.  Finnick is an audacious flirt, but he has a true and tragic love, and it’s not with the Girl on Fire.  It was already annoying that they tried to market Katniss-Gale-Peeta as a Twilight-esque triangle when deciding between two boys is so not the bulk of her dilemma or even something that she’s willing to spend time thinking about.  She’s preoccupied with, oh, I don’t know, little things like providing for her family, protecting her sister, staying alive, resisting tyranny, trying to make the self-sacrifices that don’t come naturally to her.  And Finnick turns out to be much more complex than the superficial sex-symbol persona he projects.  He’s got his own secrets and form of resistance.  The relationship between Katniss and Finnick dances between ally and enemy, not “will they-won’t they,” (unless you end that phrase with “kill each other.”)  Meanwhile, the relationship between Katniss and Peeta takes significant steps in Catching Fire, and the total lack of Peeta in either of these pictures is not making me feel confident that the movie will handle him any better this time around.  Couldn’t they have at least included him in the second picture, looking jealous, annoyed, or amused in the background?

Why do the people behind this design feel the need to add fuel to the fanfiction, non-canonical fires?  “omg, Katniss and Finnick, so hawt together!!!” the easily-persuaded, annoying peripheral fans now scream.  NO.  STOP IT.  Go read the book so you can fall properly in love with Peeta, since apparently the movies aren’t going to give you the opportunity.

**update** Two more pictures have been released, (you can click here to see them at EW.com), and we finally get a glimpse of Peeta.  It looks like he and Katniss are on their District tour; I would guess they’re in District 11 and Katniss is looking down at Rue’s family.  The way Peeta is looking straight ahead and there’s a gap between him and Katniss is probably good for that scene but it’s not doing anything to combat the Katniss+Finnick implied narrative of the first images.  The second new picture is Gale being restrained by two Peacekeepers in the center square of District 12.  The Peacekeeper’s uniforms look live they’ve been restyled a little big from the first film, but they still basically look like Stormtroopers.

3 Comments

Filed under Books, movies